Comments on: A letter to Apple http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:48:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: MacBook Pro Team - Apple http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-748 MacBook Pro Team - Apple Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-748 Thank you for your feedback on the MacBook Pro. We cannot respond to you personally, but please know that your message has been received and will be reviewed by the MacBook Pro Team. If we need to follow up with you on your ideas for improving the MacBook Pro, we will contact you directly. We appreciate your assistance in making the MacBook Pro a great computer. MacBook Pro Team
 Apple Thank you for your feedback on the MacBook Pro.

We cannot respond to you personally, but please know that your message has been received and will be reviewed by the MacBook Pro Team. If we need to follow up with you on your ideas for improving the MacBook Pro, we will contact you directly.

We appreciate your assistance in making the MacBook Pro a great computer.

MacBook Pro Team

Apple

]]> By: Wille http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-749 Wille Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-749 I have an iMac with a glossy screen, and it's probably the best screen I've ever had, the colours are strong and vibrant enough to avoid the glossyness being a problem, although I can see how it would be a problem if the screen wasn't as bright. However, I'm mostly disappointed with the fact that they still persist with 1440x900 resolutions for their 15" MBP's. Common, it's the 21st century! Even $500 budget laptops of that form factor have 1680x1050 resolution screens. The lack of proper resolution for a laptop that big is a big show stopper for me, and it makes the regular Macbook look more enticing not only on price. I have an iMac with a glossy screen, and it’s probably the best screen I’ve ever had, the colours are strong and vibrant enough to avoid the glossyness being a problem, although I can see how it would be a problem if the screen wasn’t as bright.

However, I’m mostly disappointed with the fact that they still persist with 1440×900 resolutions for their 15″ MBP’s. Common, it’s the 21st century! Even $500 budget laptops of that form factor have 1680×1050 resolution screens. The lack of proper resolution for a laptop that big is a big show stopper for me, and it makes the regular Macbook look more enticing not only on price.

]]> By: Daan http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-750 Daan Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-750 Hi Wille, With a stationary iMac you can regulate the lighting conditions (in most cases). I like to take my Macbook everywhere I go, even outside. But I can't see anything with a glossy screen in full sunlight. Inside, I mostly dim the screen to minimal brightness, which is easier on the eyes. Maybe I should start wearing sunglasses for regular computer work ;-) Think there should be a choice of matte screens. The previous Macbook Pro had that choice. Agree with you on the resolution argument. I remember two years ago seeing a (high-end) laptop with 1920x1080 resolution. Macbook Pro's are top of the line, with their price, features and design. They surely should deliver a higher resolution than this. Hi Wille,

With a stationary iMac you can regulate the lighting conditions (in most cases). I like to take my Macbook everywhere I go, even outside. But I can’t see anything with a glossy screen in full sunlight.

Inside, I mostly dim the screen to minimal brightness, which is easier on the eyes. Maybe I should start wearing sunglasses for regular computer work ;-)

Think there should be a choice of matte screens. The previous Macbook Pro had that choice.

Agree with you on the resolution argument. I remember two years ago seeing a (high-end) laptop with 1920×1080 resolution. Macbook Pro’s are top of the line, with their price, features and design. They surely should deliver a higher resolution than this.

]]> By: Anonymous http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-751 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-751 Don't really care about Mac, but as a software developer, glossy is the way to go for sure. No longer do I suffer from eye fatigue looking at those matte grainy screens, contrast and color is also much better. Having said that, Apple is all about making the choices for you, if you are not satisfied, go somewhere else - I seriously think they couldn't care less. Don’t really care about Mac, but as a software developer, glossy is the way to go for sure. No longer do I suffer from eye fatigue looking at those matte grainy screens, contrast and color is also much better. Having said that, Apple is all about making the choices for you, if you are not satisfied, go somewhere else – I seriously think they couldn’t care less.

]]> By: Gyorgy http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-752 Gyorgy Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-752 That's why the new macbook comes with a clean sheet :) That’s why the new macbook comes with a clean sheet :)

]]> By: Steve Jobs? No way! http://stuq.nl/weblog/2008-10-15/a-letter-to-apple/comment-page-1#comment-753 Steve Jobs? No way! Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-753 One more thing! Ok, we'll consider your feedback. One more thing. g. g. g. g. One more thing! Ok, we’ll consider your feedback. One more thing. g. g. g. g.

]]>